Showing posts with label GE food. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GE food. Show all posts

Sunday, April 05, 2009

Animal Fat and Fat Animals


Since Skyguy's cancer diagnosis in late 2007, I've been trying to
improve our diet by adding more vegetables and fiber, and I've tried to cut back on high fat meat dishes by substituting more lean meats like venison and oily fish. We eat fish at least once a week, usually tuna or salmon, and I eat a can of sardines or mussels once every few days or so, but more is better. With Skyguy's father's recent colon cancer diagnosis, it is more important than ever that we continue making healthy dietary and lifestyle changes. I want this post to be about diet, not smoking, but I can't write this without saying that Skyguy smoked from the age of 12 to the age of 48 (36 years), and I smoked from the age of 19 to the age of 47(26 years). We were both heavy smokers and we both were able to quit smoking using Chantix in January of 2008. I highly recommend this to anyone who wants to quit but who has been unable to do so using herbs or gum or patches or willpower alone. The Chantix did have some side effects, but it was worth it to not be driven insane by cravings. If I can do it, anyone can do it.

Americans eat a diet high in fat, mostly fatty meat and dairy products. Of course, some fat in the diet is good, but we generally overdo it. When a high fat meal is consumed, hormones are released which slow down the digestive process and increase the output of bile and enzymes to help breakdown the complex molecules. Very often the bloated feeling we get after eating is due to this slowdown. When early hominids began to increase the fat in their diet, this digestive slow down allowed them to feel fuller, and because they spent less time looking for food, they were able to sleep more. When they slept more, the brain evolved and grew larger, and humans became smarter. Today, we have gone overboard with the fat, and with a sedentary lifestyle where most work is done behind a desk-no more foraging-no more hunting-no more farming, our brain size isn't increasing, but our clothing size is! If we ate more fiber to flush out the fat and harmful substances in food, it might not be so unhealthy, but most Americans don't eat a diet high in fiber, only a diet high in fat.

I've been increasingly interested in the human diet as it correlates to human evolution. Mankind has always pulled a harvest from the sea, so it is not surprising that fish and seafood are generally easy to digest. Early man would have easily been able to gather food in the tidal pools along a shoreline. I'd say poultry, reptiles, and small mammals like rabbits would be next on a list of relatively easily digestible animals. I can envision early man capturing these 'white meat' animals with few or no tools, meaning that our bodies have processed these types of protein and fat for eons and should quickly digest them today. Something like venison or antelope or similar cervid types would be next on the digestibility scale, if my theory about exposure and adaption would hold true. Today's version of beef would be probably the newest 'meat' addition to the human diet, and while I am sure that ancient man ate yak or buffalo or some type of bovine, I'd wager that it was not a regular part of diet and that these animals were eaten only under special circumstances. For one, they were too large to be practical unless one was killed for a tribal feast or something. Secondly, today's slaughterhouse steer is a far different animal than it's bovine cousins that have been eaten in the past. I would actually guess that pork has been a part of our diet longer than beef. Swine have such poor eyesight that they would seemingly be easier to trap or kill in a pit even, and they are more the right size for a family group or tribe.

I was discussing some of this with my friend Sage who is a vegetarian, and she brought up a very good point as well, that animals like cattle were historically grass fed, free ranged, and field corn isn't part of their natural diet. Pork is like beef in that today, we feed these animals a corn based diet and that changes the health of animal as well as the health of the consumer who eats them. A pig that is not allowed to forage for mushrooms, seeds, and roots in the woods will never be as healthy or nutritious as one that has roamed free. Much of today's animal feed is made from genetically modified corn(again thanks to Monsanto et.al.). Since the cow's digestive system was not designed for corn from an evolutionary standpoint, corn simply creates a fatter cow. When industrial beef is sold by the pound, it is faster and more desirable to add fat pounds than muscle pounds, and of course, corn does that(for humans, too!). However, one must ask if fatter is healthier, for either the cow or the consumer. Most people would say no, that being lean is healthier. It has only been in the last century that corn has become King of feeds. Yields increased with farming methods and the excess was turned into animal feed. Later, in the 1970's, the excess was used to make High Fructose Corn Syrup. Our bodies, rather, our digestive systems, simply haven't had enough time to adapt and process HFCS, and cattle and swine certainly must have the same problem with the addition of corn in their diet. Whether or not you think GE corn and HFCS is healthy or harmful, it is a fact that adaption takes time, and not enough time has elapsed for our bodies to adapt and evolve so that we can process these seemingly foreign substances(fattier meat from corn fed animals and HFCS) without harm. I think the same could be said for foods like margarine and shortening and other foods that contain highly processed oils. But I digress...

Anyway, as strange as it sounds, probably the first red meat was from other humans-which might lend credence to the mythos that eating another human being gives one that person's strength, etc. Compared to other foods that early man might have eaten, snakes, frogs, turtles, etc., I would think human flesh would be very energy rich and nutritious. I'm kind of freaked out just writing about it, so I'm sure that it did not take long for early humans to develop taboos about such.

I think my digestive system operates like a pack rat....if it gets something that it can't digest well, or something foreign that it doesn't know how to process, it stores it in a fat cell somewhere, just
in case it is needed later. If what is stored in the fat is a carcinogen or other harmful substance, then we risk disease until we can eliminate the substance from our system. This can be a real problem for all animals, including humans. As animals are exposed to toxins in the environment, like dioxins-PCBs, these substances are stored in the animal's fat cells, which other animals or humans later consume. Dioxins have been found in the fat of many food animals; it is a real problem in fish, but it is also in beef, pork, and chicken fat. Humans are exposed to these toxins directly in the environment and indirectly via the food chain, and being at the top of pyramid, we store the pollution-the pesticides, the dioxins, the PCBs of our parent's and grandparent's world-in the fat cells of our own bodies. Is it any wonder that cancer seems like an epidemic? Is it any wonder that more and more people are reducing or eliminating meat from their diet? In actuality, I believe that most digestion is aided by bacteria and enzymes in the gut. A vegetarian might not have the same bacteria or enzymes as a someone who regularly eats meat and that can cause digestive problems if they happen to consume animal protein, at least temporarily until the gut flora is able to compensate or diversify. The system will then adapt to the 'new' food...but that type of adaption is quick and possible because humans have been eating meat for hundreds of thousands of years. When the body is given something as artificial and as new as HFCS, there may be no bacteria or enzymes to aid digestion at all. It is genetically modified-a three way Frankenfood-what processes that??? The additional fructose causes all kinds of problems, but that is a topic for another day.

Make sure that you know what you are eating, and eat what you know will be good for you. Look for healthy alternatives and make small, sustainable changes to your diet.

Friday, March 13, 2009

Friday the 13th: Frankenfuels and Frankenfoods


I heard recently that big oil companies are buying up bankrupt biofuel companies. I'm not sure why they are bankrupt, but with business practices the way they are today, nothing surprises me. Perhaps people are waking up to the fact that they get fewer miles per gallon with ethanol. Perhaps it is simply an availability issue. Perhaps people are protesting Monsanto et.al. with their wallets. The reason machts nicht, but having companies like Shell combine with companies that are in bed with other giants like Cargill and Monsanto is a real nightmare.

Biofuel from corn is not new. Since the Carter administration and the gas crunch of the 1970's there has been a mandate for producing alternative fuels and vehicles. Actually, making ethanol from corn is as old as the hills and hollers of Appalachia, except 100 years ago it was called Moonshine and it was the entrepreneurial homesteaders that reaped the benefits from producing it. A sip of white lightning eased the pain from the day's labors or the pain from life's hardships. (Damn, I could use some of that!) Selling or trading a jug or ten was good income and kept many families afloat. These days, Monsanto is the only true benefactor from corn ethanol. They genetically engineer the corn and if I remember the stats correctly, the amount of land required to grow enough corn to provide transportation fuel for a year for one person is the same amount of land needed to feed 7 people. With the world's population growing almost exponentially, that's not very sustainable. They don't care though, because in a few years, they will control the world's food supply AND fuel supply.

Using Biofuels with gasoline sounds great, but when you start looking at it a bit closer, the idea is full of pitfalls. First, there are many plants that produce more ethanol per acre than corn. Agave has great potential and is grown in the desert. Cattails have great potential, and they can be grown in colder climates. Giant grasses and sugar cane also outproduce corn. Sorghum, willow, poplar, and I'd bet that even sweetgum trees would also produce more ethanol per acre of crop than corn.

Normally, I would say okay, Monsanto, patent that! But sadly, they have taken up that challenge already. They have already patented many plants in India and China, plants that have been cultivated and used for thousands of years. Plants like grain amaranth and turmeric are patented as if Monsanto invented them. This practice is called bio-piracy. They are stealing and claiming age old plants or specific components/extracts of plants as their own creation(for example they might patent the curcuminoid extract of turmeric plants as their own product). By doing this, they can control the plant's growth and use. If you are not familiar with the evil Monsanto power grab, here are a few older articles to give you a bit of an introduction:

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0115-04.htm http://www.purefood.org/Patent/monsanto_biopirates.cfm
http://www.no-patents-on-seeds.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=39&Itemid=42 http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/monsanto-pig-patent-111

(yes pigs, and there are patented chickens, too!)



Now biodiesel is another matter entirely. Unlike ethanol biofuels, there are many promising biodiesel 'feedstocks'. Algae shows great promise and can be grown anywhere.
If you are interested in alternative energy from renewable, living sources, check out The BioEnergySite.

http://www.thebioenergysite.com/

Tuesday, March 03, 2009

Sugar Sugar



I bought some stevia at the store last week. It is the stevia extract sold in packets like sugar and sugar substitutes. I've grown and used stevia before, so I felt like I knew what I was getting, however, the extract, while sweet, does have a bit of taste to it. I don't recall the leaf having a taste like this, so it must be from the extraction process, maybe even the solvent. It is not unpleasant, not bitter, but I can tell the difference between this stevia extract and table sugar in my coffee. I bought it simply out of curiosity, as stevia does not adversely affect one's blood sugar levels the way sucrose, table sugar, does. I have family members with diabetes, and you just never know what health surprises the future might hold.

Table sugar is historically made from sugar cane (see photo) or from beets, natural plants. Chemicals like saccharin and aspartame are not plant derived, and even though High Fructose Corn Syrup *is* plant derived, I think it borders on being evil. I learned recently that in Mexico and in other countries around the world, Coca cola is made with sugar, not high fructose corn syrup(HFCS) like here in the states. The fructose from sugar cane is actually sweeter than the the HFCS, so you use less and the result tastes better. Most people don't realize that before 1985, Coke was made with cane sugar. When New Coke failed and Coke Classic emerged, it really wasn't the same formula as the sugar had been replaced with high fructose corn syrup. Due to tariffs and trade barriers, HFCS is cheaper than sugar.

In every two liter bottle of soda, there is the equivalent of one bottle of Karo syrup in it. You do know that Karo is corn syrup, right? From a health perspective, this presents multiple problems. Because HFCS is less sweet, you need more of it to satisfy taste, and it seems that it is now in everything you buy-they are even putting it in honey now, so be sure of your honey source! Mostly the corn used is GMO corn. That alone is a reason to stop drinking soft drinks. There is even evidence that the process used to make HFCS taints the product with mercury. HFCS also contains more carbonyl compounds than cane or beet sugar. These substances are often cytotoxic, meaning that they kill cells in the human body, and are often the cause for diabetic ulcers and poor circulatory effects.

Recently, Pepsi announced that it is considering a return to using cane sugar in it's soft drinks. I've always been a Coke fan, (growing up in the Atlanta 'burbs you can't be anything but a Coke fan!) but perhaps I will give Pepsi another try if they make the switch. For the most part, I have cut back on soft drinks, but I do love a coke every now and then the way some folks like a beer on a hot day or at the ball park. Old habits die hard. I'd rather consume Mexican Coke with sugar than American coke with HFCS.

Obesity and Diabetes are out of control in the United States. This was not the case 50 years ago. Is our gluttony, industrial substitutes like HFCS, or physical inactivity to blame? Perhaps it is bit of all three for most of America. We used to walk across the living room to adjust the volume on the TV or radio, now can even turn on lights, ceiling fans, and air conditioners with remote controls. Some people might be pre-disposed genetically, but mostly I think it all boils down to personal responsibility. Triple E. Educate yourself about food additives and food itself. Eat with your lifestyle in consideration (manual laborers need more calories than office workers), and Exercise as much as you can. I'm wiggling my feet as I type since I am still 30-40 pounds away from my goal and officially 25 pounds overweight.

Chef Jamie Oliver, AKA the Naked Chef, suggests that President Obama tax sugar. What needs to be taxed is High Fructose Corn Syrup. If manufacturers would eliminate HFCS from food products, the health of this country would improve in less than 5 years, I think. Not only could the tax generate income for health care, but long term, diseases exacerbated by obesity would dwindle and reduce the need for expensive treatments. It the loss of sales from HFCS might even put a dent in Monsanto's pocket.

I think I will send our President a letter. Feel free to join me. His newly appointed and confirmed Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack (D), is pro-GMO corn-the former governor of Iowa-the nation's leading corn producer. Nothing will change if we don't speak up. Vilsack certainly would not be in favor of a tax on HFCS.

Thursday, February 26, 2009

Panem et circenses

The subject of the economy and President Obama's speech came up on one of my email groups. It got me thinking about the way things are, so today, I am posting a rant here in response.

She wrote:
I figure if we owe nothing, no matter what he does we'll be o.k.
I do wish the voters had actually gone out and done their homework! Now all I can do is light some candles, burn a smudge and hope to whom or whatever that the Chinese don't call the loans due!
I never thought I'd say it but I think we have actually gone from the frying pan into the fire! Dumbya had our grandchildren and great-grands in debt. This circus is going to have 7 generations in debt OR MORE!


I'm fed up. FED UP with the status quo. I know a lot of people are as well. I don't know who to be angry with, who to complain to, or what good any action in isolation will do. I don't think things will be okay for everyone. I used to think that as long as I stay out of trouble and pay my debt, I'd be left alone and I could be as eccentric as I wanted to be... No mas.

Electing McCain/Palin would have been jumping from the frying pan into the fire. Maybe we could have put the fire out after that administration left office. I think the damage done would have been mitigable. I think electing Obama/Biden landed us right in the blast furnace. There is nothing I can do about the generations of debt that will have to be paid as a result of the dishonesty in the upper echelons of government AND private corporations. The damage is done, and thousands of people are laughing all the way to the bank. I just have to hunker down and try to pay off my own debt as quickly as possible. With my additional $13/week, I suppose the best thing to do is to buy seeds. I'm feeling pretty pessimistic about things today, so take that into consideration for what is coming. Sometimes, I find myself actually hoping that 2012 really is the end of the world as we know it, because the world as we know it sucks and it's getting worse, not better. Perhaps we will all have the option of crossing into a parallel universe, one where the concept of greed doesn't exist.

By non-conforming, am I making myself a target for surveillance? By expressing my opinion, am I setting myself up for censure or worse? Am I over-reacting, responding to some Brave New World paranoia? I don't think so. I've heard stories of dissident relocation camps for years. I think I might have even seen one. If such things do exist, I'm bound to end up there one day because of my views. You can call me crazy-I heard that back in the 1980's when I was talking about genetically engineered animals and food. Twenty five years later, it is ubiquitous, the problem is that no one knows it, so I am still the crazy one who sees GMO's everywhere.

There are people that referred to the Bush administration as Fascist. Is the current administration really better, or does it just use a different approach? The Bush Administration produced the Patriot Act to spy on us because 'we must protect ourselves against the terrorist next door-it's for the public good, for safety'. The Obama Administration produces the Smart Grid(11 billion appropriated in the stimulus package) and wants to use Enhanced ID to qualify for his social programs. That is spying on us for 'our own well-being and for energy conservation and the public good-for safety'.

If you ever saw the movie "White Knights" with Mikhail Baryshnikov, you know that the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics monitored it's citizens. Neighbors were encouraged to rat on neighbors, and it led to genocide ...65 million or more. The Nazis also spied on their own people....more death followed.

In fairness, this issue goes beyond party politics, really. For half a century, we have been consistently giving up our rights for the sake of safety or convenience. We talk about Big Brother and the government usually during the Republican administrations because it is during those years we look outward at the world and deal with security and foreign policy. Usually, during Democratic administrations, the focus is more on budgets, the economy, healthcare and other domestic issues. The Obama administration is on new ground, mixing the two. Big Brother is now Super Brother after the largest increase in the size of government in American history. The red states and the blue states are all in the same situation. If we are still around in eight years, we certainly won't have any privacy left. The Enhanced ID allows tracking of individuals and now with the Smart Grid, GE food, and control of the banks, energy, and homeland security, the American people will be in a full out guillotine choke. The powers that be, the PRO government (Pelosi, Reid, Obama) just hope that the people won't notice the loss of privacy and personal rights, or if we have been properly brainwashed and conditioned, we won't care, because it is for the good of all. It is worse than more of the same; the escalation in our loss of individualism and privacy is non-linear. Americans are in a Brave New World, but other countries have preceded us.

The Initial Decrees of the Bolshevik party were really similar to the promises we hear today....I realize that most folks these days apparently want socialism, but what road are we traveling?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolshevik_Initial_Decrees

1. The Decree on Peace outlined measures for Russia's withdrawal from the First World War without "payment of indemnities or annexations".

To me, that sounds a lot like Obama saying that we will get out of the Middle East and honor his commitment to veterans by expanding the VA and increasing pay.

2. The Decree on Land outlined measures by which the peasants were to divide up rural land among themselves. It advocated the forceful dissolution of many wealthy estates by peasant forces.

When I read that, my first thought was "Share the Wealth" I recall that story about homeless people squatting in foreclosed McMansions...

3. The Workers' Decrees outlined measures for minimum wage, limitations on workers' hours, and the running of factories by elected workers' committees. This consolidated Bolshevik support amongst the working classes in the cities, where they had taken power.

We are raising wages, encouraging unions, and giving tax cuts to the working class.

If you have some time, you should read some of these decrees. It's not so different from where we are today. It's a bit unnerving considering the latest accusations of power grabs by the Executive Branch and the Democratic Party(e.g. census matrix, new appointments, etc. etc.)

Where are we headed??

Speaking of circuses...

iam pridem, ex quo suffragia nulli uendimus, effudit curas; nam qui dabat olim imperium, fasces, legiones, omnia, nunc se continet atque duas tantum res anxius optat, panem et circenses.

… Already long ago, from when we sold our vote to no man, the People have abdicated our duties; for the People who once upon a time handed out military command, high civil office, legions — everything, now restrains itself and anxiously hopes for just two things: bread and circuses

(Juvenal, Satire 10.77–81) Roman poet, almost 2000 years ago, still relevant today.

Fruit-sniffing beagle and chimera chickens

Last night, we watched Homeland Security, a new reality type TV show that follows various employees that fall under the helm of the Department of Homeland Security. There were stories of border guards, immigration officials, USDA inspectors, etc. It was rather interesting to see how tedious some inspections have become in the last seven years. Most people took the inspections as a necessary evil in this age of terror, but some were simply frustrated by the bureaucracy. At an airport, one passenger forgot to declare his lunch that contained an orange, a food item which was sniffed out by a citrus-sniffing beagle and that initiated a search which resulted in a $300 fine. He was forced to pay on the spot else go to court and risk paying up to $50,000 if found guilty. That sounds crazy, but a necessary evil if you consider how much damage was caused by the Mediterranean fruit fly or how much the lowly fire ant has changed life in the South, not to mention the expense and pollution consequences of eradication. I suppose a zero tolerance law is needed, but it just seems like overkill.

By contrast, this evening on the Documentary Channel, we watched a program about genetically engineered foods and their consequences, both to the primary natural species, the environment, and secondary consumers. Here is the Documentary Channel's description of the program:

Life Running Out of Control
2004 -
From the loss of biodiversity to health scares about GM food, the effects of genetic technology are prompting more and more debate. This documentary is an intelligent look at both sides of the issue. Made for ARTE.

The program discussed how companies are creating chimera chickens, chickens with genes modified to eliminate their broody instinct, and vegetables without seeds. Monsanto and other companies like ConAgra are patenting natural crops like turmeric. I try to stay current on the GE debate, but I was not aware that this was happening. The documentary is now five years old, an eternity in the history of GE food. I shudder to think of the schemes and tactics in use today. Late in the program, while they are discussing GE fish, one anti-GMO researcher-activist makes a statement that there is not one law in the United States that prevents companies like Monsanto from creating, marketing, or selling Frankenfish. At the time the documentary was made(and this may still be true-I'm not sure), there were no laws at all concerning GE food. There was no requirement for independent safety testing, no requirement to notify or inform the consumer, and there was no recourse if the promises of safety were lies. Monsanto lied about the safety of DDT, Agent Orange and PCB's, and then when the truth was born out, they tried to cover their tracks and shuck responsibility. Now, we are supposed to trust them that GE food is safe and the answer to the world hunger. Right. Sadly, most Americans are not scientifically minded or interested in genetic engineering or it's consequences. They are perfectly happy with their high fructose corn syrup made from GE corn.

So, it all boils down to this...in the United States, GE food is created, marketed, and sold to us. We eat it without any laws to protect us, but don't try to bring an 100% natural, organically grown orange through customs.

It is an insane world.