It's been a while since I blogged about Obama and politics in general. I know most of my friends and readers just love the guy, so I try to hold my tongue, but every once in a while, I just have to talk about it. His recent nomination of
Sotomayer to the Supreme Court requires discussion, a lot of discussion. First though, I thought I would see how my views aligned with the rest of the country. I took these latest poll results from Real Clear Politics:
President Obama Job ApprovalApprove 60.5%
Disapprove 32.5%
Congressional Job ApprovalApprove 35.7%
Disapprove 54.7%
Direction of CountryRight Direction 45.0%
Wrong Track 47.7%
I find it interesting that people support Obama, but not Congress. I wonder why that is? They are all the same party-all pushing the same agenda! In this case, Congress is the hand of the Presidency...he speaks, they 'make it so'!
Before I get to
Sotomayor, I read a few days ago that the Obama administration and the Pentagon are now saying that troops will stay in Iraq for as long as ten more years, despite the agreement with Iraq that said all troops would be home by 2012. Of course, we all remember
Obama's pledge on his trip to Iraq last summer-to bring the troops home in 16 months. That's what he told the troops-that they would be home in 16 months, in other words, by Christmas of 2009. If you cut him slack and start the 16 months from January, then the homecoming will be in April of 2010. Obama is still saying that combat forces will be home then, but that other troops might have to stay until 2012. I think this is a promise broken, but we will see. I'm not fond of his word games. "Troops" become 'combat forces', "new jobs" becomes 'saved jobs", etc. We now have 139000 soldiers in Iraq an 52000 in Afghanistan. Obama will send 21,000 more combat forces Afghanistan this year. In one breath, he says that he doesn't expect to send more to Afghanistan after that, yet in the other, he claims that's where the fight is, that Afghanistan is
more important than Iraq for troop victory. He also said he would close Guantanamo, but 5 months after that announcement, he is now backing up and reinstating some Bush Admin orders, contradicting his own executive orders issued right after the inauguration. Closing Camp X-ray at Guantanamo Bay was one goal in which I supported Barack Obama. I'm not sure what the answer is now, but surely we could figure out a way to maintain security and meter justice to those being held. The months tick by, and Camp X-Ray is still holding enemy combatants.
I read an AP article about
Obama's plan to create jobs. The results are rather scary. This is a good example of politics affecting how quickly the economy recovers. The Associated Press reviewed 5,500 projects nationwide and found that the government will spend 50 percent more per person in areas with the lowest unemployment rates than in places with the highest. For example, The AP says Elk County, Pennsylvania, which has about 14 percent unemployment, is getting no money. But Riley County, Kansas, which has a jobless rate around 3.5 percent, will get $56 million to build a new highway. The reason is because Riley County already had a plan. The worst hit areas don't have the finances to set up projects in advance, so only the municipalities that have not been hit too hard and have projects ready for the bulldozer are getting funded. There is still a lot of pork in the system, but I'm sure it will all spin out looking rosy.
The Obama administration is spending money right and left. There is no way to know if the programs will be effective. Much of the spending seems to have nothing to do with economic stimulus or recovery, but it seems to have been on a Democratic Wish List for decades. However, I will say that Wall Street seems a bit more stable and I heard that housing sales are increasing, so perhaps he has at least stopped the panic over the economy. Much to my surprise and joy, he has reversed his position on raising taxes, and now has moderated his plan to basically sound like John McCain's.
LOL! Who would have thunk it?
I think what has happened is that he was a bit naive in the beginning, thinking that is popularity would allow him to change everything. As he finds out that change isn't quite as simple as he thought, he has to back away from his initial promises(Guantanamo, taxes, new jobs, etc.). He's doing a lot of backtracking. In some ways, it is moderating action in a way that I actually approve of, but it is only a matter of time before he angers his adoring populace. One of the reasons I did not like Obama to begin with was that I thought him horribly naive, and yet people bought into that. His
naivety extends to his foreign policy decisions, and in that arena, I think he is walking on thin ice and putting the country at some risk. I dislike Dick Cheney and never thought I would be agreeing with him, but I do think Obama is not showing the world that America is strong by his constant apologies and his lack of a firm stand on torture-the interrogation/
waterboarding issue-I mean, is he or isn't he backing
Pelosi? I fear that we will soon be tested in a way that we never have been before. If we appear weak, there will be enemies that will take advantage and test that weakness. I hope I am wrong, but I fear that I am not.
I'm about tired of the word 'historic'. Everything Obama does is historic. If race really did not matter in this country, the word historic would have been put to rest months ago. Now, he has
announced that Hispanic
Appellate Judge Sonia
Sotomayor is his choice to replace
Souter on the Supreme Court. He says she has 'empathy'. I am not sure I would call it that. In 2001 at the University of California at Berkeley,
Sotomayor said “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who
hasn’t lived that life.” She doesn't think that a judge should try to rise above race and gender, and she is on the record that there should be more women and Latina judges.
Sotomayor is a very well educated and qualified woman. Obama is right in that her story is definitely compelling. There is no doubt about that. What bothers me is that she is doing the very same thing that is criticized if a white person does it. I really think the effect will be a disservice to women and minorities of all backgrounds due to the backlash from her comments. If a Caucasian American judge, or even a African American judge, said that her own experiences would allow her to reach a better judicial conclusion that a white man or a Latino man or a Hispanic Woman or whoever, we'd call that bigotry and it would be condemned. If a White male judge said the same thing, that the richness of his experiences would allow him to reach a better conclusion than a Latina woman, we'd call that racism. Obama doesn't seem to call it bigotry or racism though. Instead, he paints it positively with the word "empathy" and that bothers me. It seems to me that to
Sotomayor, gender and skin color are more important than intellect, experience, compassion and education. This is the exact opposite of the lessons we teach our children about equality for all. Maybe there should be more women judges. To remedy that, we don't need to appoint the unqualified, we need to encourage little girls to learn critical thinking and analysis, we need to encourage teens to become politically active and care about
SCOTUS decisions, and we need to encourage young women to go to law school instead of getting master's degrees. We are making progress-it is certainly better now than when I was a kid, but we still have a ways to go. As the Hispanic and Latino populations grow, so will the number of judges representing those ethnic groups. When
Sotomayor promotes her own gender or ethnicity in this way, talking about seats and positions that should be filled, she is saying that not only does ethnicity and gender make a difference, but she thinks it actually makes her better than other genders or
ethnicities. In my opinion, that's wrong. If you think I am reading in too much, I challenge you to read some of her quotes. IMO, she clearly thinks that she, as a Latina, is better than a white man, not because of her education or experience, but because she is a Latina. The sad thing is that I believe she is qualified for the job and would probably serve justice well in spite of her bigotry. As a woman myself, I'm quite sure she has fought her way into this position and put up with a lot of abuse over the years. My hat is off to her for that. I also read that she may have trouble in the confirmation process due to her combativeness and emotional responses. I feel for her in that regard as well. I, too, become combative and emotional when on the defensive.
I got a call from the NRA about
Sotomayor the other day. It seems that Obama’s nomination
Sotomayor is being painted as a declaration of war against gun owners and the Second Amendment. You will recall that Washington DC banned all guns. Recently, there has been much debate as to whether or not the Second Amendment, the right to bear arms, applies to states. The Bill of Rights was meant to limit the Federal government, not states or cities or other local governments. If a part of the Bill of Rights is part of the Fourteenth Amendment, then it would apply to the states. There are a couple of other judges who have made similar rulings, and in fact, the split is about 50/50 for those who think states have the power to ban guns vs. those who think that states do not have the power to ban guns. Judge
Sotomayor thinks city or statewide gun bans are perfectly acceptable. President Obama has said that he has nothing against guns, however, soon he will be taxing ammunition and serializing it. If you fire a round at a tree, the powers that be will be able to determine what kind of round it is, who purchased it, when and where it was purchased, etc. The Second Amendment says nothing about ammo, does it? Gun owners, in their fear of the future, have created a ammunition shortage that has not eased in the last 8 months. If you need a job, try to find an ammunition factory, because they are working around the clock trying to keep up with demand. I can only hope that
Sotomayor doesn't get approved, but I see nothing to stop her. Democrats are in control of Congress. That was my biggest beef as to voting Obama into office. The US Government operates on checks and balances. With Obama in office and a Democratic Congress, there are no checks and balances. With this appointment, the Supreme court will take a left turn as well.
If I sound a bit ambivalent, criticizing one moment and 'empathizing' another, well, I am. When I take various quizzes and such, I'm always labeled very conservative, way right of center. However, I don't think I am that far to the right. I do believe in personal responsibility and accountability and that usually registers as anti-entitlement which puts me right of center. But, I am not totally against entitlements. There are people who need disability and unemployment, but there is so much abuse and misuse in the system that it is distressing. I am definitely pro-choice, and I definitely believe there should be separation of church and state. I don't want to see the Ten Commandments hanging in the lobby of the courthouse, but if a judge wants to display them on the wall of his private chambers, I have no issue with that. I say all of this as a counter to the notion that I am a right wing nut job. I actually think I am rather moderate. I'm not a fan of Obama, but then, I wasn't a fan of Bush either. I believe that I have been very critical of every president since Reagan, and then I was more or less following his wave of popularity in the way that so many younger folks are cheering on Obama today. I just want everyone to take a hard look at what is really going on. Sometimes what we personally want or believe is not what would be best for this country. I may not agree with the decisions that left leaning Supreme Court Justices hand down, but I believe that those justices are needed in the Court. We have to have balance. We have to try to represent as many views as possible. It is by understanding and listening to a viewpoint different from our own that we grow as a nation and as human beings. I want fairness. I want my Justices not to necessarily agree with me, but to look at all sides and consider people as equals, because we are all equal. I'm afraid that Judge
Sotomayor doesn't think we are all equal. I believe that she thinks that Latinas are superior, and that belief has no place in the
SCOTUS. Of all people, our President should understand the dangers of bias based on ethnicity and gender.